Vic premier pressured on IBAC ‘interview’

Strain is mounting on Victoria’s premier to reveal if he is been interviewed for a second time by the state’s corruption watchdog as a part of an lively investigation.

Daniel Andrews was questioned by the Unbiased Broad-based Anti-corruption Fee in a personal listening to linked to Operation Sandon, The Australian studies.

The long-running probe centres on allegations of beneficial planning and property improvement choices at Casey Metropolis Council, with the premier reportedly quizzed on property developer John Woodman.

Watch the Federal Election 2022 on Channel 7 or stream it without spending a dime on 7plus >>

The corruption watchdog has beforehand heard Mr Woodman or his firms donated to a number of Labor MPs and the Liberal Occasion forward of the 2018 election.

IBAC confirmed its draft report for Operation Sandon has entered the pure justice section, providing witnesses with adversarial findings the best to reply.

“IBAC is not going to making any additional touch upon the investigation,” an IBAC spokesperson stated in an announcement on Friday.

It comes after a separate IBAC report on the misuse of public assets within the Victorian ALP leaked final week, with Mr Andrews named as one among 26 witnesses interviewed throughout the probe.

The premier refused to remark till the ultimate report was handed down, and an Andrews authorities spokeswoman was equally mute on his reported Operation Sandon interview.

“The federal government is not going to touch upon an lively IBAC investigation,” she stated.

Artistic Industries Minister Danny Pearson was left to entrance the media, declaring it will be “inappropriate” to make any remark.

Opposition Chief Matthew Man stated Victorians had a proper to know what number of instances Mr Andrews had been interviewed by IBAC and, if correct, why was he afforded a personal listening to.

“We’re owed that. There are such a lot of questions the premier has to reply about this,” he stated.

Victoria’s corruption watchdog can concern witnesses confidentiality clauses, making it a felony offence to reveal details about an investigation.

The IBAC Act states examinations are “typically” to be held behind closed doorways until there are “distinctive circumstances”.

Public hearings may be held when it’s within the public curiosity, they will not trigger “unreasonable injury” to an individual’s repute, security or wellbeing, or the witnesses’ conduct could also be critically or systematically corrupt.

The opposition has promised to up IBAC’s funding and encourage it to carry extra public hearings if it wins the state election in November.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.